he's worth a hell of a lot more than the runs he scores. the man's got a cricketing mind -- honestly, I think he's a second captain on the field, and probably more of a strategist than Ganguly is.
And remember what he did to Warne? That wasn't too long ago. I still think he will be the best batsman since Bradman by the time he's done, which is a good 6-7 years from now.
For chrissakes, you're talking about the man of the tournament in world cup 2003. you'd drop him?
If anything, all this "is he past his prime" talk is more indicative of what people expect from him, and less of his form.
I don't know if people care about stats, but here goes -- total tests, followed by last 10 tests, last 20 tests, last 30 tests.
unfiltered 111 9265 241* 57.19 32 37 31 3/10 47.12 0 71 0
filtered 10 825 241* 51.56 2 3 4 2/36 68.50 0 5 0
filtered 20 1592 241* 51.35 4 7 6 2/36 74.66 0 9 0
filtered 30 2688 241* 58.43 8 11 9 2/36 77.88 0 15 0
Hell, I'd pick any player averaging 51.56 in a slump...
He's class, he's having a rough patch.(301* was a scratchy innings
:rolleyes
End of story.