Worcester win Warm-up match against Warwickshire Under 17s

[chris.hinton]

Worcester win by 10 wickets in a Easyly won match

Warwick Under 17

N.Poonia B Ali 1
O.Higgins B Ali 6
S.Allen C Hick B Warne 0
A. Wilkinson B Warne 0
N.Breaksphere B Batty 9
S.Moreton B Lampitt 1
C.Booth C Lampitt B Warne 12
M.Hinton B Lampitt 12
Z. Mamood B Warne 0
S.Friswell St Rhodes B Warne 0
R.Young B Warne 6
Extreas 1
Total 49
Ali 3-2-3-2 Warne 8-1-16-5 Lampitt 2-0-7-1 Batty 1-0-6-1 Liptrot 2-0-15-0

Worcester

G.Hick Not out 22
V.Solanki Not Out 21
Ext 7

Poonia 3-0-21-0 Mahmood 2-0- 17-0
Hinton 1-0-6-0



[Edited on 5/22/02 by chris.hinton]

[Edited on 5/22/02 by chris.hinton]

 

[trueblueyork]

21+21+1 makes 43 i think and bears U17 got 43....unless my maths is THAT bad i think thats a tied game or chris is making it up.....and now i total up the bears scores and i get 48 i must be freaking out :O...now look at the bears bowling figures...21+17+6 gives 44 while worcs have only scored 43 :O i must be going nuts i better stop this....lampitt 2 wickets in the score card but in his figures only 1 wicket?warne has taken 6 in the scorecard but only 5 on the figures....i dont think vc4 is that buggy...i smell something fishy here...

 

[trueblueyork]

now totalling worcs bowling figures we get.....

3+16+7+6+8 = 40 while bears have scored 48+1 extra :O:O:O:O

[Edited on 5/22/02 by trueblueyork]

 

[marc71178]

It was an unofficial game, and all the Warwickshire players have been sacked for taking part in it without my permission.

 

[Neil Pickup]

Good to see you've lost none of your zero-tolerance Marc.

It's totally made up as Chris can't work the VC4 code files yet.