-
Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.
*Official* Season X Discussion and Results
- Thread starter Mr Mxyzptlk
- Start date
honestbharani
Whatever it takes!!!
Will probably borrow the one Punter is gonna throw away.dontcloseyoureyes said:May I suggest a bat with a graphite back?
Here come the runs. 
Cloete
International Captain
Mr Mxyzptlk said:
Considering they'er both competing for places, one wonders if he didn't just the ball into his arm as hard as possible.
Anyway great win to the Blues! Blewy was inspirational, magnificent knock! Sean put in a great all-round performance (as opposed to his usual great all-round performance
) and Liam also contributed well.Have to give my biggest congrats to the new yell captain, who, in his second game, came up with a sterling spell of bowling. Congrats Votly!
Magrat Garlick
Global Moderator
Cricket Web Red v Cricket Web Green
at CW Oval
A thunderous eighth-wicket partnership between Xavier Rose and Ben Vaughan dug the Greens out of a very deep hole at the CW Oval, caused by good mid-innings bowling from Kennett and Loganathan and suicidal tactics agaisnt Jack Teague. However, when it really mattered, they conceded 100 to the eighth-wicket pair, and had to see 291 up on the board despite all their good work with the ball.
The Reds looked good for long periods, with an opening stand of 156 between Stedman and Markus. However, a mid-innings return of Xavier Rose saw two wickets, and Red never really kept up with the run rate at the end - under 60 runs came off the final ten overs, as Mitchell, Cameron, Rose and Cunningham kept the rate down well, and Stedman's innings of 112 simply hogged up too much time. In a match where the bowlers had been traded out, it was ultimately the batsmen who failed to accomplish their task.
Cricket Web Green 290/7 (50 ovs) beat
Cricket Web Red 268/6 (50 ovs) by 22 runs
at CW Oval
A thunderous eighth-wicket partnership between Xavier Rose and Ben Vaughan dug the Greens out of a very deep hole at the CW Oval, caused by good mid-innings bowling from Kennett and Loganathan and suicidal tactics agaisnt Jack Teague. However, when it really mattered, they conceded 100 to the eighth-wicket pair, and had to see 291 up on the board despite all their good work with the ball.
The Reds looked good for long periods, with an opening stand of 156 between Stedman and Markus. However, a mid-innings return of Xavier Rose saw two wickets, and Red never really kept up with the run rate at the end - under 60 runs came off the final ten overs, as Mitchell, Cameron, Rose and Cunningham kept the rate down well, and Stedman's innings of 112 simply hogged up too much time. In a match where the bowlers had been traded out, it was ultimately the batsmen who failed to accomplish their task.
Cricket Web Green 290/7 (50 ovs) beat
Cricket Web Red 268/6 (50 ovs) by 22 runs
Last edited:
steds
Hall of Fame Member
Ahh crap. Our new look bowling attack may need time to adjust to OD cricket. Marmite Marc was decent again, backing up by tight spells from Borks and Tharmi, who was awesome. Go Tharmi! Kennett got OD wickets, too 
pity he couldn't be more economical.
Markus was his usual self and it's good to see Jimmy S getting another good 100. Good shot for world Cup squad, me thinks.
I would shout "GO REDS!", but it hurts my broken pelvis.
pity he couldn't be more economical. Markus was his usual self and it's good to see Jimmy S getting another good 100. Good shot for world Cup squad, me thinks.
I would shout "GO REDS!", but it hurts my broken pelvis.
chaminda_00
Hall of Fame Member
A bit surprised you guys dropped Ed, easierly been our best OD bowler. Really need some more runs from the lower middle order, Thamba time to pull your finger out.
Last edited:
kears_falcon_9
International Debutant
I think youll find the partnership was between rose and vaughan. but great write up there hak.
Robertinho
Cricketer Of The Year
Shocking stuff, guys. Only players who stood up were Stedders, Ian and Tharmster. C'mon Reds
age_master
Hall of Fame Member
Fantastic performance guys, Solid opening partnership (i scored faster then Rob for once) then abit of a collapse - spectacularly saved by Vaughan and Rose to get us to a good score.
Great bowling from Rose including the key wickets of Markus and Dauth saw us nicely home
Great bowling from Rose including the key wickets of Markus and Dauth saw us nicely home
62* off 44 and 3/39! What a guy
bugssy
Cricketer Of The Year
age_master said:Fantastic performance guys, Solid opening partnership (i scored faster then Rob for once) then abit of a collapse - spectacularly saved by Vaughan and Rose to get us to a good score.
Great bowling from Rose including the key wickets of Markus and Dauth saw us nicely home
yer great win guys, that was definately a must win game, and skip i let out score me lolna well done and to the boys down the bottom who kept it alive esp xavier well batted well bowled and i might as well just add well fielded.........
honestbharani
Whatever it takes!!!
Great win but 
@ my performance.
@ my performance.new_age_ar
First Class Debutant
You have one good game and now you think your good enough to have a go at me. But yes your right i better step it up very soon or i might find myself on the bench. After a clean out of the bowling the batting must not be too far off.chaminda_00 said:
Oh there was one thing i enjoyed about this game:
Code:
NG Scott c T Mamesh b T Loganathan 13 20 0 0
AUST_HiTMaN
International Debutant
I must say I am disappointed that Edmunds wasn't in the posted XI, as he was in the preliminary squads discussed with the selection panel. Hak?chaminda_00 said:
