• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

***Official*** England in India

Jono

Jono

Virat Kohli (c)
42 run partnership, this is hilarious. Particularly since you would have thought Patel would have been sent in ahead of Sreesanth.
 
I

IndianByHeart

U19 Vice-Captain
In order to win matches its very important to get rid of tailenders soon.I think England missed a golden opportunity here by allowing Indian non-specialist batsmen to score some invaluable runs.

Munaf is next in and he's no bunny with bat, India shouldn't give a lead of more than 60-75 runs.
 
DanielFullard

DanielFullard

U19 Vice-Captain
I dont see the point in putting Monty in. He hasnt looked very threatening throughout the innings and at this stage we need these taileneders out and to be out under pressure and even though Monty has bowled well with a good economy, hes not what we need attacking these tailenders right now
 
Magrat Garlick

Magrat Garlick

Global Moderator
DanielFullard said:
I dont see the point in putting Monty in. He hasnt looked very threatening throughout the innings and at this stage we need these taileneders out and to be out under pressure and even though Monty has bowled well with a good economy, hes not what we need attacking these tailenders right now
Click to expand...
You're saying Udal's looked more threatening?
 
andyc

andyc

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
steds said:
:laugh: Udal couldn't be look threatening if he had a balaclava, an AK-47, some rope and a clamping device.
Click to expand...
Quoted for the typo.

Anyone on cricbuzz? Look out for me.
 
andyc

andyc

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
DanielFullard said:
I dont see the point in putting Monty in. He hasnt looked very threatening throughout the innings and at this stage we need these taileneders out and to be out under pressure and even though Monty has bowled well with a good economy, hes not what we need attacking these tailenders right now
Click to expand...
*cough*
 
andyc

andyc

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
DanielFullard said:
Hey, Im not one to shy away when I am wrong. Im glad I was. We needed that wicket.
Click to expand...
Haha yeah fair enough. It's not as if I've been right all the time (looks at Langers' sig). Spinners often do have a knack of getting out tailenders, though.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Top