AWTASymonds: No
Yuvray: Yes
If its a good wicket with the ball coming on with little sideways movement, Yuvraj should be okay. Otherwise it is very dicey.Yuvraj intrigues me, however. He's improved a lot as a batsman over the last year or two IMO and it wouldn't shock me if he turned out to be a decent test player. That doesn't mean I think he should be in the side now though, as I don't - there are better players ahead of him. Given Laxman seems to be on the decline somewhat, he may get his chance soon though, and I think he could go either way as a test batsman.
Which explains his vastly inferior first class average.Symonds is so much better with the bat its not funny.
Says it all. Congratulations on being the second ever member to be placed on my ignore list.Symonds could average 5 and I would still rate him higher than Watson.
Says it all. Congratulations on being the second ever member to be placed on my ignore list.
He can't read that you know #1.
Wasn't suggesting that TBH, Thought #1 would be a cool nickname for you and I was merely reflecting that people can't read smilies very well. Jeez Richard.I know who #1 was, it was FILOCRICKET, and this was one of the most extreme cases in CW history. Those with really long memories could probably do some sort of comparison to the Shawn Badyk incident (don't worry - if you don't know about it it's best it stays that way).
I mean, this bond21 doesn't seem anything worse than your routine "troll" to me TBH, even though saying Symonds > Watson rates as pretty much the lowest of the low on the Cribb scale.
There are trolls, and then there are trolls who push my buttons. I can usually spot a troll and hence either not reply to them or at least not take them seriously. However, people believing what he does actually angers me so I'd be tempted to reply to all his posts - which wouldn't be good for anyone.I know who #1 was, it was FILOCRICKET, and this was one of the most extreme cases in CW history. Those with really long memories could probably do some sort of comparison to the Shawn Badyk incident (don't worry - if you don't know about it it's best it stays that way).
I mean, this bond21 doesn't seem anything worse than your routine "troll" to me TBH, even though saying Symonds > Watson rates as pretty much the lowest of the low on the Cribb scale.